As I understand it, this is what occurred. Debbie was promoting eBay on her AsWas thread. Steve went there and started to put down eBay and sellers that use it as their main selling channel. Debbie took offense. It moved to the main forum. A private email of Debbie’s regarding a Webinar was circulated by Steve without her permission. This could substantially harm Debbie’s business.

An ethics complaint was filed against Debbie. Steve was actively reviewing Ethics Committe deliberations because he had access to their Forum, and sent an email to the Ethics Committe during their deliberations in an attempt to influence their decision. An ethics complaint was filed by Debbie against Steve. Steve then filed an ethics complaint against Larry citing a conflict of interest. Larry then filed an ethics complaint against Steve, stating that Steve was inappropriately trying to influence the Ethics Committee. The ethics committee made their decision on Steve vs Debbie, and Debbie vs Steve, which in turn was overruled by the BOD.

Suspensions to the BOD members were reduced. When the decision was overturned, the ethics committee was upset, stated that, and two of their members were suspended. There is alleged misconduct on the ethics committee for viewing the board forum. Suzanne posted information to this effect on her blog, as did Ina. Suzanne has sent (unfiled I believe) a cease & desist order. Debbie has sent a cease and desist and asked for an apology and transparency from the BOD and Steve. There are allegations of libel against board member(s).

How could this have been avoided? Someone stated, “making a mountain out of a molehill.” The third sentence didn’t need to happen. It easily could have been avoided. It should have been moderated, preferably, self-moderated. I call for the boards’ resignation, and an open vote of membership to fill the board. Current board members are free to remain members, and run for a position.

It is time to get this train back on the tracks.